FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • You seem to have missed the discussion on Talk:Number of Appearances Comparison of Animals, Summons and Other Creatures that started because of your edit.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I see that you have added character form categories to transcript pages that didn't have them. I just want to tell you that I often left them out for a reason. In some cases it's because the character doesn't appear on-panel in that page (but only as dialogue) and I intend the form categories to be for forms that we can see rather than only infer. In other cases I didn't make form categories because the character only appears in one form.

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • Lophotrochozoa wrote:

      ThorG wrote:

      Lophotrochozoa wrote: I have no objection for Edward. What other examples are you referring to?

      The others are Carol, Catalina, Cranium, Pandora and Wolf.

      I'm weakly in favor of calling Cranium and Wolf Agent but I'm opposed to including Catalina's and Pandora's last names and unsure about including Carol's last name.

      Pandora Chaos Raven is pretty long ...

        Loading editor
    • ThorG wrote: Unless, we create a separate type of category for characters who are heard but not seen (Like for example, "Voice Luke Appearances Story") I think we can just assume they are in the last form they were established as being in so they are still counted properly.

      Are you aware that character statistics and form statistics are counted separately?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Also, I already told you to KEEP the content of reference even if duplicate, for case someone will remove the second reference later. I'm reverting and won't bother redoing other changes because you pissed me off.

      Loading editor
    • AutowikiBrowser automatically removes the content of references if they're duplicates. I've made sure the reference names are the dates of the references so even if the original reference gets deleted it isn't hard to relink it.

        Loading editor
    • Even if it's the dates it still requires to recover correct syntax - dates don't work for all pages.

      Seriously it can't be turned off? Also, you should turn off "Tagger".

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm seriously considering banning you. You keep doing changes spawning whole wiki without even attempting to talk about it in advance. Sure, most of them make sense, but what will I do when you do something stupid on hundred pages? Even just reverting it will be lot of work, and you are mixing it with other changes.

    Specifically this "story arc": Sure, in most cases it's superfluous, but it's CLEAR. It means noone needs to be checking if specifically the story arc they just want to link needs some suffix. And the wikia actually autocompetes it, so it's not even more keypresses. AND there should be redirects to solve cases where someone is lazy.

    I'm also not comfortable with articles which names are just year number, but I suppose we really don't have anything else to put there.

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • I've already fixed the redirects to storylines.

        Loading editor
    • ... oh. Didn't noticed it in last changes. And Identity was missed due to the underscores, I guess.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello,

    before removing Tony and Principal Verrückt, did you checked whole wiki to verify there are no links to Minor characters pointing to them?

    ... no you didn't. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] .... see recent changes for whole list. Next time I'm reverting.

      Loading editor
  • Why did you remove the categorisation from Category:Needs Summary? Did you think it would delete the category?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The idea about keeping content of reference instead of abusing the fact it's copied when the reference is named is that technically someone could remove earlier reference. Not that it should happen often.

    Also, you really should be reading your wall.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I hope that every time you rename image and remove the date from it you check if the date is indeed mentioned in summary. Generally, I don't see the point.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • AutoWikiBrowser gives you lot of power, you should also have matching responsibility. For start, if you are changing something you should first say what you plan and convince me it's good idea.

    Division of character images by characters was good idea, although I think we should leave some "Images of Minor Characters" category to not create category for characters who have just one or two images ... in fact, even four is too few unless it's likely they will get more.

    But your decision to change description (used on most images) to summary I don't understand. Also, putting emphasis on every image being edited feels unnecessary - personally, I was using "edited" only when I was making some additional changes in image besides just cropping it out, like removing voice bubbles.

      Loading editor
    • ThorG didn't divide the category. I did.

        Loading editor
    • The default headings created when uploading images are "Summary" and "Licensing" (at least when they are filled out) so I wanted to make that consistent across all images. If an image is uploaded without a summary or license then it will have the heading "Description" but given that all images should have their source and licensing specified and providing those things when uploading results in the former 2 headings it makes sense to me that all existing images should follow that pattern in order to set the example of what should be there when uploading new images.

      With "edited", I want to emphasize that excerpts of comic images are still copyrighted and not original works no matter how much they are changed. I think trying to identify all the images that are not edited beyond cropping (and thus not really "edited") would be too difficult so I standardized the text for all images aside from full comic images and non-comic-derived images in order to cover the borderline cases.

      Also, I am not 94.255.128.75 but I'm amazed at how they are able to make so many changes in such a short time without something like AutoWikiBrowser ... unless they are just that motivated.

        Loading editor
    • ... oh. I'm uploading most images through the popups so never noticed. Ok, that does make sense. I still suspect "summary" will be in minority ...

      Of course it would be hard to identify it ... especially now. You really think it would sound like original work without the "edited" part?

      Oh. I noticed 94.255.128.75 started it but though you continued ... Without AutoWikiBrowser and without being registered ... motivated indeed. Or just using another tool which doesn't require permission.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, does the last few hundreds of changes means you actually know what's AutoWikiBrowser and how to use it? Or how did you do it? Could it do other changes or just categories?

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.