No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think Dan is shown in his female form about as often as in this form. Should this category be renamed "Male Dan"? [[User:Lophotrochozoa|Lophotrochozoa]] ([[User talk:Lophotrochozoa|talk]]) 14:18, December 26, 2019 (UTC) |
I think Dan is shown in his female form about as often as in this form. Should this category be renamed "Male Dan"? [[User:Lophotrochozoa|Lophotrochozoa]] ([[User talk:Lophotrochozoa|talk]]) 14:18, December 26, 2019 (UTC) |
||
| − | :Note what Dan has on twitter: "He/Him in spite of my identifying as "confused shrug"." I think that we can leave the category as-is, although if it wouldn't already exists it might be better to call it "Male Dan". -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:59, December 27, 2019 (UTC) |
+ | :Note what Dan has on twitter: "He/Him in spite of my identifying as "confused shrug"." I think that we can leave the category as-is, although if it wouldn't already exists it might be better to call it "Male Dan". For now at least ... Dan may change mind later. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:59, December 27, 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:00, 28 December 2019
I think Dan is shown in his female form about as often as in this form. Should this category be renamed "Male Dan"? Lophotrochozoa (talk) 14:18, December 26, 2019 (UTC)
- Note what Dan has on twitter: "He/Him in spite of my identifying as "confused shrug"." I think that we can leave the category as-is, although if it wouldn't already exists it might be better to call it "Male Dan". For now at least ... Dan may change mind later. -- Hkmaly (talk) 23:59, December 27, 2019 (UTC)